Quality & Substantiation: ZBiotics® Pre-Alcohol
Engineered Probiotic Ingredient: Bacillus subtilis ZB183™
About ZBiotics® Pre-Alcohol and Bacillus subtilis ZB183™
ZBiotics® Pre-Alcohol is a beverage containing a patented, genetically engineered probiotic (B. subtilis ZB183™) that helps you land on your feet the day after drinking alcohol. It’s engineered to break down an unwanted metabolic byproduct of alcohol consumption called acetaldehyde – the main culprit behind rough mornings after drinking. This probiotic was fully developed by ZBiotics’s in-house team of microbiologists and is available exclusively from ZBiotics.
Quality Testing
At ZBiotics, we pride ourselves on our relentless focus on quality in our products. While quality starts in the lab when we build each strain, it doesn’t stop there. We extensively test every manufacturing batch of both our probiotic ingredients and our final products to ensure that we are not only delivering clean and unadulterated products, but also delivering functional and viable products.
The testing standards we apply to Pre-Alcohol and its primary ingredient Bacillus subtilis ZB183™ are listed below.
Please note that the following information is subject to change without notice and may be out of date. While we endeavor to keep this information updated, our quality systems evolve over time, and we cannot guarantee that this page may not reflect outdated information from time to time.
Testing of Bacillus subtilis ZB183™ probiotic biomass
This is our hero ingredient and what makes Pre-Alcohol special. We thoroughly test every single batch, so we know for sure we have clean, viable, and safe probiotic going into every final product.
Activity
Validates that the probiotic ingredient is producing the enzyme acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) and that the enzyme is active. Because the production of active ALDH is the key function that makes B. subtilis ZB183™ perform the task of converting acetaldehyde into acetate, it’s critical to ensure that this function is preserved in every new batch we produce.
Strain Activity Acetaldehyde dehydrogenase can drive the formation of a coenzyme called NADH from the oxidized form of the coenzyme, called NAD+ in the presence of Acetaldehyde. We can measure the activity of the ALDH enzyme by monitoring the production of the NADH from NAD+. | Limit / Target >9 nmol NADH/min/mg total protein | Method ALDH NAD+ Plate Assay (as described in Hassan-Casarez et al, 2024) | Testing frequency Every batch |
Viability
We run germination and flow cytometry tests to help ensure that the manufacturing process has not caused damage to the probiotic bacterial spores in a way that could impact their functionality.
Germination We simulate spore germination with an amino acid trigger to ensure each batch is viable and can germinate as expected. | Limit / Target Cells respond to germination trigger with a drop in OD600 in less than 1 hour | Method OD600 Germination Assay (as described in Tehri et al., 2018) | Testing frequency Every batch |
Dormant Spores | Limit / Target High (>85%) | Method Flow Cytometry | Testing frequency Every batch |
Germinated Cells | Limit / Target Low (<10%) | Method Flow Cytometry | Testing frequency Every batch |
Injured Cells | Limit / Target Low (<10%) | Method Flow Cytometry | Testing frequency Every batch |
Dead Cells | Limit / Target Low (<10%) | Method Flow Cytometry | Testing frequency Every batch |
Probiotic Quantity
We measure the quantity of viable probiotic bacteria per gram of finished ingredient in order to specifically calculate how much powder needs to go into the final product to ensure we hit our delivered CFU target.
Enumeration (CFU/g) | Limit / Target As tested‡ | Method CMMEF (5th Ed., Chpt 20), mod. | Testing frequency Every batch |
Purity
We ensure every lot is a single strain of the intended probiotic. We sequence to ensure no mutations have arisen during fermentation that could impact performance
Spore Microscopy | Limit / Target Spherical/elongated‡ | Method 1000X Phase Contrast | Testing frequency Every batch |
Cell Microscopy (after germination) | Limit / Target Rod-shaped‡ | Method 1000X Phase Contrast | Testing frequency Every batch |
NGS (next-generation sequencing) Genotype | Limit / Target <4 SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism) >80% occurrence, 90% max coverage† | Method Map to reference, SNP analysis | Testing frequency Every batch |
NGS Purity Running NGS on every single batch helps ensure that the only microbe that was grown in any given batch was our target microbe—B. Subtilis ZB183™. Note that standard microbial contamination testing only tests for known pathogens, but doesn’t actually check whether there are other non-pathogenic microbes in the batch. We go the extra mile with NGS sequencing to ensure that it’s not just pathogens we’re testing for, but all non-ZBiotics microbes. | Limit / Target >99%† | Method Map to Reference | Testing frequency Every batch |
Organoleptics & Stability
Color | Limit / Target Light to dark tan† | Method Organoleptic | Testing frequency Every batch |
Visual inspection | Limit / Target Visually free from foreign material† | Method Organoleptic | Testing frequency Every batch |
Texture | Limit / Target Crystalline, free flowing powder† | Method Organoleptic | Testing frequency Every batch |
Odor | Limit / Target Strong fermentation† | Method Organoleptic | Testing frequency Every batch |
Moisture content | Limit / Target <10%† | Method AOAC 925.09 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Water activity | Limit / Target <0.5† | Method No reference | Testing frequency Every batch |
Contamination – Microbial
Yeast and mold | Limit / Target ≤ 300 cfu/g† | Method US Pharmacopeia Ch 2021 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Salmonella | Limit / Target Negative/10g† | Method US Pharmacopeia Ch 2021 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Coliforms | Limit / Target ≤30 cfu/g† | Method CMMEF Ch 8.7 | Testing frequency Every batch |
E. coli | Limit / Target Negative/10g† | Method USP <2022> | Testing frequency Every batch |
L. monocytogenes | Limit / Target Negative/25g† | Method FDA BAM Ch 10 | Testing frequency Every batch |
S. aureus | Limit / Target <10 cfu/g† | Method USP <2022> | Testing frequency Every batch |
Presumptive B. cereus | Limit / Target <100 cfu/g† | Method FDA BAM Ch 14 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Contamination – Heavy Metals
We applaud the FDA Closer to Zero Initiative and support this standard being set for all foods. We proactively comply by setting our heavy metal production specifications not more than 10x of median production values.
Lead | Limit / Target <900 ppb† = <0.0018 ug/serving† | Method AOAC 2011.19, 993.14, 2015.01 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Mercury | Limit / Target <10 ppb† = <0.00002 ug/serving† | Method AOAC 2011.19, 993.14, 2015.01 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Cadmium | Limit / Target <400 ppb† = <0.0008 ug/serving† | Method AOAC 2011.19, 993.14, 2015.01 | Testing frequency Every batch |
Arsenic | Limit / Target <600 ppb† = <0.0012 ug/serving† | Method AOAC 2011.19, 993.14, 2015.01 | Testing frequency Every batch |
†Release Specification (i.e. we won’t release product if it doesn’t meet this specification)
‡Key Performance Indicator (used to track general product performance and quality, but not a release specification)
Testing of Pre-Alcohol final product
We run these tests on our final formulated product when they are being filled into the final sellable units. The formulation includes B. subtilis ZB183™ as well as other ingredients like flavors and stabilizing fillers.
Probiotic Quantity
Enumeration (CFU/g) | Limit / Target Meets ALDH performance standard | Method CMMEF (5th Ed., Ch. 20), mod. | Testing frequency Every batch |
Physical & Organoleptic
Appearance (includes color) | Limit / Target Cloudy light tan liquid | Method Visual inspection | Testing frequency Every batch |
Taste | Limit / Target Acidic, sour, citrus | Method Sample taste | Testing frequency Every batch |
Contamination – Microbial
Yeast and mold | Limit / Target ≤ 100 cfu/g† | Method AOAC 997.02; BioLumix | Testing frequency Every batch |
Salmonella | Limit / Target ≤ 100 cfu/g† | Method AOAC 997.02; BioLumix | Testing frequency Every batch |
E. coli | Limit / Target Negative/25g (or Absent/10g)† | Method AOAC 997.02; BioLumix | Testing frequency Every batch |
S. aureus | Limit / Target Not Detected/10g† | Method AOAC 997.02; BioLumix | Testing frequency Every batch |
B. cereus | Limit / Target ≤ 100 cfu/g† | Method BioLumix | Testing frequency Every batch |
L. monocytogenes | Limit / Target Not Detected/25g† | Method BioLumix | Testing frequency Every batch |
Contamination – Heavy Metals
Lead | Limit / Target < 0.00001 ug/serving | Method STM-ICP1000 | Testing frequency Annually |
Mercury | Limit / Target < 0.00001 ug/serving | Method STM-ICP1000 | Testing frequency Annually |
Cadmium | Limit / Target < 0.00001 ug/serving | Method STM-ICP1000 | Testing frequency Annually |
Arsenic | Limit / Target < 0.00001 ug/serving | Method STM-ICP1000 | Testing frequency Annually |
†Release Specification
‡Key Performance Indicator
Substantiation Studies
At ZBiotics, we benefit from the incredible work of the scientists and institutions who have spent years studying alcohol, acetaldehyde, and how they affect the way you might feel the day after drinking.
Acetaldehyde concentrations build up in the colon
Jokelainen, K., Roine, R. P., Vaananen, H., Farkkila, M. & Salaspuro, M. In vitro acetaldehyde formation by human colonic bacteria. Gut 35, 1271–1274 (1994). Go to study | Study Type In vitro | Research Institution Research Unit of Alcohol Diseases and Department of Gastroenterology, University Central Hospital of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland |
Salmela, K. S. et al. Characteristics of Helicobacter pylori alcohol dehydrogenase. Gastroenterology 105, 325–330 (1993). Go to study | Study Type In vitro | Research Institution Research Unit of Alcohol Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland |
Konkit, M., Choi, W. J. & Kim, W. Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in Lactococcus chungangensis: Application in cream cheese to reduce aldehyde in alcohol metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 1755–1761 (2016). Go to study | Study Type In vitro and in vivo | Research Institution Department of Microbiology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea |
The role of acetaldehyde in discomfort
Mackus, M., Stock, A.-K., Garssen, J., Scholey, A. & Verster, J. C. Alcohol 121, 9–18 (2024). Go to study | Study Type Mix of in vitro and in vivo studies | Research Institution Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands |
Eggleton, M. G. The diuretic action of alcohol in man. J Physiol 101, 172–191 (1942). Go to study | Study Type Mix of in vitro and in vivo studies | Research Institution Department of Pharmacology, University College, London, UK |
Penning, R., Nuland, M. van, Fliervoet, L. A. L., Olivier, B. & Verster, J. C. Curr. Drug Abuse Rev. 3, 68-75 (2010). Go to study | Study Type Mix of in vitro and in vivo studies | Research Institution Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands |
The minimal impact of alcohol on dehydration
Quertemont, E. & Didone, V. Role of Acetaldehyde in Mediating the Pharmacological and Behavioral Effects of Alcohol. Alcohol Res Health 29, 258–265 (2006). Go to study | Study Type Mix of in vitro and in vivo studies | Research Institution Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands |
Jung, T. W. et al. Alcohol and Alcoholism 41, 231–235 (2006). Go to study | Study Type In vivo | Research Institution Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, and Department of Internal Medicine,Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |